00:22:54	Orit Shaer:	https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/95416/1/The%20Influence_TSpace.pdf
00:23:58	Orit Shaer:	Questions? Share them here:
00:28:00	Nadia Fereydooni:	You mentioned that there is a risk associated with automation which is varied for different groups. Do you think the users themselves have a perception about this risk?
00:28:17	Peter Mawhorter:	Do you think that less-experienced drivers might be less willing to engage in secondary activities while driving outside of an experimental setting, which might blunt the effect of their worse performance?
00:31:16	Peter Mawhorter:	(Does pay level factor into the survey issue in your opinion? I’ve found anecdotally that it might)
00:32:40	Andrew Kun:	https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1071181319631283
00:33:39	Joanne Harbluk:	Could you say a bit about the catch trial/sanity check methods that you used?  thx
00:33:42	Diana Tosca:	@Peter, In my limited experience, some people try to breeze through the survey when they know they’re getting paid and try to game the system by not answering questions and submitting the survey…
00:34:57	Peter Mawhorter:	@Diana, for sure this does happen; my experience (on MT) was that attention check failure rates were in the low single-digit percents at pay rates ~$15/hour. But I was also doing studies about video games and got a lot of people who gave other feedback that they found the study really interesting…
00:36:48	Diana Tosca:	This was my experience as well, Peter! Some people gave very good, in-depth answers at about the $15 pay rate. The answers that didn’t pass the vibe check were few and far between.
00:39:03	Diana Tosca:	What’s the line/limit when secondary distractions actually become an issue or hazard? Is it related to how long people take their eyes off the road, or something else?
00:42:15	Peter Mawhorter:	(I don’t do research in this area, but I wonder if partnership with a trucking company or the like would let you safely mail them instrumentation to be taken along on real drives?)
00:42:27	Albrecht Schmidt:	ist it really working? or are we ooling ourselfs with online?
00:44:11	Sinan Arkonac:	I have to leave early, but this was a very interesting and informative talk. Thank you Birsen and the organizing crew!
00:47:00	Diana Tosca:	So what’s the remedy @Albrecht?
00:47:32	Diana Tosca:	Is it to publish less so called “novel” studies?
00:48:19	Anna Cox:	Was discussing this pattern of publication today with my students https://dl.acm.org/cms/attachment/5a1d2882-5d48-48aa-a039-9279b7a88cf2/f2.html
00:49:01	Chris Janssen:	interesting data Anna!
00:49:01	Anna Cox:	and arguing for how useful it would be to have more of the lit review type paper
00:50:32	Tiasa Kim:	Please excuse me for leaving, but thank you so much for sharing these intriguing insights!