00:27:30 Andrew Kun: Questions - please type them here. 00:28:26 Diana Tosca: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wo6y_ef2N88&feature=emb_logo 00:28:39 Diana Tosca: ^If anyone is interested in the mind wandering talk! 00:29:05 Chris Janssen: I am curious about a practical aspect of Erin’s work: with techniques like fNIRS (and portable EEG), sometimes the devices that people wear are big, and limit some flexibility of the user (or lead to some social awkwardness). Is this also an issue in Erin’s work? How does she limit these concerns, such that the measurement becomes better? 00:35:21 Max L. Wilson: Its very hard to see, though, what in the ‘scientific’ fNIRS devices is costing $30k. 00:44:34 Max L. Wilson: Q: im wondering what Erin, and others, think about the relationship between what’s happened with fNIRS in HCI vs the Neuroergonomics community (which has kind of grown really fast over the last few years), but has more diverse a research community. 00:45:23 Peter Mawhorter: Q: Is there room for simulations (e.g., VR) to help bridge the gap between mobility limitations of high-resolution brain imaging and the “real world” experience? 00:45:40 Max L. Wilson: Thats a better question than mine 00:47:01 Max L. Wilson: Wow! 00:47:52 Max L. Wilson: I cant wait to see what you do with it 00:48:03 Chloe Eghtebas: How robust is FNIRS and does it need to be as frequently calibrated as compared to EEG (e.g. to use in the wild as a part of a head mounted display)? Is FNIRS as heavily dependent on post processing methods as compared to EEG to use in applications?