(Possibly Imperfect) Proof #1

You should work on this problem individually (no partners) and submit your answers as a PDF file to Gradescope.
Read the below proof carefully and then answer the questions at the end.

As a helpful reference, you can view a few (possibly imperfect) examples of proofs and their critiques here.

Problem: 2n vs n2
\(2^n ≥ n^2\)

Claim: For any integer n ≥ 4, \(2^n ≥ n^2\)

Proof:

Base Case (n = 1): We must show that the inequality \(2^n\) ≥ \(n^2\) is true when n=1. When n=1, the left hand side of the inequality is \(2^1\), which equals 2. When n=1, the right hand side of the inequality is \(1^2\), which equals 1. Since the left hand side is larger than the right hand size, the base case holds.

Inductive Case (n ≥ 2): Let us assume that the inequality is true for n, i.e., that \(2^{\color{Red}n}\) ≥ \({\color{Red}n}^2\) holds (this is our inductive assumption!) and we will prove that the inequality is true for n+1, i.e., that \(2^{\color{Red}{n+1}}\) ≥ \(({\color{Red}{n+1}})^2\). Here, we will start with the expression \(2^{n+1}\) and, step by step, we will establish that \(2^{n+1}\) is greater than or equal to \((n+1)^2\):

\(\begin{array}{rll} 2^{n+1}&= 2 \cdot 2^n & \hspace{20pt}{\color{Blue}{\text{by algebra}}}\\ &\geq 2 \cdot n^2 & \hspace{20pt}{\color{Blue}{\text{by inductive assumption}}}\\ &= n^2 + n^2 & \hspace{20pt}{\color{Blue}{\text{by algebra}}}\\ &\geq n^2 + (2n + 1) & \hspace{20pt}{\color{Blue}{\text{since } n^2 ≥ (2n + 1)}}\\ &= (n + 1)^2 & \hspace{20pt}{\color{Blue}{\text{by algebra}}}\\ \end{array}\)

Thus, \(2^{n+1}\) ≥ \((n+1)^2\), and the inductive case holds. ■


Questions

  1. What type of proof are you providing feedback for (e.g., proof by contradiction, proof using a definition, proof by induction, etc.)?
  2. Do you find the proof presented in a way that is clear or confusing to understand?
  3. What is one thing that you like about this proof and/or that this proof does well?
  4. What is one thing that could be improved in this proof?
  5. The proof is not entirely correct. What makes this proof incorrect? Please explain your reasoning carefully here, and point out succinctly what might have gone wrong in the proof.