Dark Buffer Arts?|?d??|?d?Segmentation fault: 11
- Checkpoint: Aim to complete a couple phases by 11:00pm Thursday 5 November.
- Due: 11:00pm Monday 9 November
- Starter code: fork wellesleycs240 / cs240-buffer and add bpw as admin
- Submissions: Commit and push your final version.
- Relevant Reading: CSAPP Chapter 3 (especially 3.12)
- Collaboration: For this assignment, you may discuss and develop reverse-engineering strategies together with other students. but you may not “drive” another student’s reverse engineering process or allow someone else “drive” yours. For example, you should not let someone else type or dictate a series of gdb commands to you or vice versa. You may discuss stack layouts, for example.
Overview
Impressed with your skills in defusing binary whizbangs, an infamous after-market magical artifact enhancement shop has called you in for an interview. To get the job, you must use some shadowy techniques to cause an unassuming pink umbrella to act like a whizbang. These techniques can easily cause our unassuming umbrella to misfire if you apply them incorrectly, but the job pays well if you get it!
Translation: This assignment helps you develop a detailed understanding of the call stack organization on a 32-bit x86 processor. It involves applying
a series of buffer overflow attacks on an executable file
called umbrella
.
In this assignment, you will gain firsthand experience with one of the methods commonly used to exploit security weaknesses in operating systems and network servers. Our purpose is to help you learn about the runtime operation of programs and to understand the nature and impact of this form of security weakness so that you can avoid it when you write system code. We do not condone the use of these or any other form of attack to gain unauthorized access to any system resources. There are criminal statutes governing such activities.
Contents
Suggested Practice
CSAPP Practice Problems 3.30, 3.31, 3.33, and others nearby are good review of the stack discipline.
Instructions
After you fork wellesleycs240 / cs240-buffer, you should find the following files in your working copy:
makecookie
: generates a “cookie” based on some string (which will be your username)umbrella
: executable you will attackumbrella.c
: important parts of C code used to compileumbrella
sendstring
: utility to help convert between string formats.Makefile
: helps prepare exploits for submission
All of these programs are compiled to run on the CS Linux machines. The rest of the instructions assume that you will be performing your work there.
You will save your buffer overflow exploits for different levels in these files:
smoke.txt
- Level 0 exploitfizz.txt
- Level 1 exploitbang.txt
- Level 2 exploitboom.txt
- Level 3 exploitid.txt
- contains your username
You are also required to keep a “journal” describing how you reverse-engineered the executable, how you constructed your exploit, and why it works. (Or, if it’s not quite working, how it is supposed to work.) Follow the pattern of your whizbang descriptions for this. We are looking for explanations that show you understand the big picture of how and why your exploit works, not just what it does. Save this in either of these files:
journal.txt
orjournal.pdf
Grading is roughly:
- Level 0: 20 points
- Level 1: 30 points
- Level 2: 35 points
- Level 3: 15 points
where the grade for each level depends on both your exploit and your descriptions.
Be sure to read this document carefully before beginning your work.
Aside: Line Endings
This is a non-issue if you work solely on Linux/Unix/Mac OS X machines.
Linux (and all flavors of UNIX in general, including Mac OS X) use a different line ending from Windows and old Mac OS (pre-Mac OS X) in text files. The reason for this difference is historical: early printers need more time to move the print head back to the beginning of the next line that to print a single character, so someone introduced the idea of separate line feed \n
and carriage return \r
characters. Windows and HTTP use the \r\n
pairs, classic Mac OS used \r
, and Linux/Unix/Mac OS X use \n
. In this assignment it is important that your lines end with line feed (\n
), not any of the alternative line endings. This should not be an issue if working on the CS Linux machines.
Bake a Cookie
For the purposes of this assignment, a cookie is a string of four bytes (or 8 hexadecimal digits) that is (with high probability) unique to you. You can generate your cookie with the makecookie
program giving your Bitbucket username as the argument:
$ ./makecookie wendyw
0x5e57e632
(Of course, you should replace wendyw
with your own username. While you are doing this, you might as well prepare the first file
you need to turn in: id.txt
$ echo your_bitbucket_username > id.txt
This will generate a text file containing your username followed by a single newline.
In most of the attacks in this assignment, your objective will be to make your cookie show up in places where it ordinarily would not.
How to use an umbrella
The umbrella
program reads a string from standard input
with the function getbuf()
:
unsigned getbuf() {
char buf[36];
volatile char* variable_length;
int i;
unsigned val = (unsigned)Gets(buf);
variable_length = alloca((val % 40) < 36 ? 36 : val % 40);
for(i = 0; i < 36; i++) {
variable_length[i] = buf[i];
}
return val % 40;
}
Do not worry about variable_length
,
val
, and alloca()
for now. All you need to know is that getbuf()
calls the function Gets()
and returns some arbitrary value.
The function Gets()
is similar to the standard C library function gets()
—it reads a string from standard input (terminated by \n
)
and stores it (followed by a null terminator, \0
) at the specified
destination. In the above code, the destination is an array buf
with space sufficient for 36 characters.
Neither Gets()
nor gets()
has any way to determine whether there is enough space at the destination to store the entire string. Instead, they simply copy the entire string, possibly overrunning the bounds of the storage allocated at the destination.
If the string typed by the user to getbuf()
is less than 36 characters long, it is clear that getbuf()
will return some value less than 0x28, as shown by the following execution example:
$ ./umbrella
Type string: howdy doody
Dud: getbuf returned 0x20
It’s possible that the value returned might differ for you, since the returned
value is derived from the location on the stack that Gets()
is writing to. The returned value will also be different depending on whether you run the umbrella inside gdb or run it outside of gdb for the same reason.
Typically, an error occurs if we type a longer string:
$ ./umbrella
Type string: This string is too long and it starts overwriting things.
Ouch!: You caused a segmentation fault!
As the error message indicates, overrunning the buffer typically
causes the program state (e.g., the return addresses and other data structured that were stored on the stack) to be corrupted, leading to a memory access error. Your task is to be more clever with the strings you feed umbrella
so that it does more interesting things. These are called exploit strings.
umbrella
must be run with the -u your_username
flag, which operates the umbrella
for the indicated username. (We will feed umbrella
your username
with the -u
flag when grading your solutions.) umbrella
determines the cookie you will be using based on this flag value, just as the program makecookie
does. Some of the key stack addresses you will need to use depend on your cookie.
Formatting Exploit Strings
Your exploit strings will typically contain byte values that do not
correspond to the ASCII values for printing characters. The program
sendstring
can help you generate these raw
strings. sendstring
takes as input a hex-formatted string
and prints the raw string to standard output. It expects input on standard in unless it is given the -f file
option, and then it reads from file
. In a hex-formatted
string, each byte value is represented by two hex digits. Byte values
are separated by spaces. For example, the string "012345"
could be entered in hex format as 30 31 32 33 34 35
. (The
ASCII code for decimal digit N is 0x3N. Run man ascii
for a full table.) Non-hex digit characters are ignored, including the blanks in the example shown.
If you generate a hex-formatted exploit string in a file
named exploit.txt
, you can send it
to umbrella
through a couple of pipes (see tools
if you are unfamiliar with pipes – they take the output of one program
and direct it as input to another program):
$ cat exploit.txt | ./sendstring | ./umbrella -u your_username
Or you can store the raw bytes in a file and use I/O redirection to supply it to umbrella
:
$ ./sendstring -f exploit.txt > exploit.bytes
$ ./umbrella -u your_username < exploit.bytes
With the above method, when running umbrella
from
within gdb
, you can pass in the exploit string as follows:
$ gdb ./umbrella
(gdb) run -u your_username < exploit.bytes
One important point: your exploit string must not contain byte value
0x0A
at any intermediate position,
since these are the ASCII codes for newline ('\n'
). When Gets()
encounters this byte, it will assume you intended to terminate
the string input. sendstring
will warn you if it encounters this
byte value.
When using gdb
, you may find it useful to save a
series of gdb
commands to a text file and then use
the -x commands.txt
flag. This saves you the trouble of
retyping the commands every time you run gdb
. You can
read more about the -x
flag
in gdb
’s man
page.
Generating Byte Codes
You may wish to come back and read this section later after looking at the problems.
Using gcc
as an assembler and objdump
as a disassembler
makes it convenient to generate the byte codes for instruction sequences.
For example, suppose we write a file example.s
containing the
following assembly code:
# Example of hand-generated assembly code
movl $0x1234abcd,%eax # Move 0x1234abcd to %eax
pushl $0x401080 # Push 0x401080 on to the stack
ret # Return
The code can contain a mixture of instructions and data. Anything
to the right of a #
character is a comment.
We can now assemble and disassemble this file:
$ gcc -m32 -c example.s
$ objdump -d example.o > example.d
The generated file example.d
contains the following lines:
0: b8 cd ab 34 12 mov $0x1234abcd,%eax
5: 68 80 10 40 00 push $0x401080
a: c3 ret
Each line shows a single instruction. The number on the left
indicates the starting address (starting with 0), while the hex digits
after the :
character indicate the byte codes for the
instruction. Thus, we can see that the instruction pushl $0x401080
has a hex-formatted byte code of 68 80 10 40 00
.
If we read off the 4 bytes starting at address 6 we
get: 80 10 40 00
. This is a byte-reversed version of the
data word 0x00401080
. This byte reversal represents the proper way to supply the bytes as a string, since a little-endian machine lists the least significant byte first.
Finally, we can read off the byte sequence for our code:
b8 cd ab 34 12 68 80 10 40 00 c3
The Exploits
Correction/clarification [Tues. 31 March]: There are four functions to exploit for this assignment. The exploits increase in difficulty. There is an addition (“Mayhem”) to the last function that you can exploit for extra pizzaz if you are having fun. Keep in mind that the grading relies on both exploits and your documentation, so describe your approach to all stages, especially any you cannot get working.
Level 0: Candle
The function getbuf()
is called within umbrella
by a function test()
:
void test() {
unsigned val;
volatile unsigned local = 0xdeadbeef;
char* variable_length;
entry_check(3); /* Make sure entered this function properly */
val = getbuf();
if (val <= 40) {
variable_length = alloca(val);
}
entry_check(3);
/* Check for corrupted stack */
if (local != 0xdeadbeef) {
printf("Sabotaged!: the stack has been corrupted\n");
} else if (val == cookie) {
printf("Boom!: getbuf returned 0x%x\n", val);
if (local != 0xdeadbeef) {
printf("Sabotaged!: the stack has been corrupted\n");
}
validate(3);
} else {
printf("Dud: getbuf returned 0x%x\n", val);
}
}
When getbuf()
executes its return statement, the program ordinarily resumes execution within function test()
. Within the file umbrella
, there is a
function smoke()
:
void smoke() {
entry_check(0); /* Make sure entered this function properly */
printf("Smoke!: You called smoke()\n");
validate(0);
exit(0);
}
Your task is to get umbrella
to execute the code
for smoke()
when getbuf()
executes its
return statement, rather than returning to test()
. You
can do this by supplying an exploit string that overwrites the stored
return pointer in the stack frame for getbuf()
with the
address of the first instruction in smoke
. Note that
your exploit string may also corrupt other parts of the stack state,
but this will not cause a problem, because smoke()
causes
the program to exit directly.
Advice
- All the information you need to devise your exploit string for
this level can be determined by examining a disassembled version
of
umbrella
. - Be careful about byte ordering (i.e., endianness).
- You might want to use
gdb
to step the program through the last few instructions ofgetbuf()
to make sure it is doing the right thing. - The placement of
buf
within the stack frame forgetbuf()
depends on which version ofgcc
was used to compileumbrella
. You will need to pad the beginning of your exploit string with the proper number of bytes to overwrite the return pointer. The values of these bytes can be arbitrary. - Check the line endings of
smoke.txt
withhexdump -C smoke.txt
.
Level 1: Sparkler
Within the umbrella
there is also a function fizz()
:
void fizz(unsigned val) {
entry_check(1); /* Make sure entered this function properly */
if (val == cookie) {
printf("Fizz!: You called fizz(0x%x)\n", val);
validate(1);
} else {
printf("Misfire: You called fizz(0x%x)\n", val);
}
exit(0);
}
Similar to Level 0, your task is to get umbrella
to
execute the code for fizz()
rather than returning
to test
. In this case, however, you must make it appear
to fizz
as if you have passed your cookie as its
argument. You can do this by encoding your cookie in the appropriate
place within your exploit string.
Advice
- You can use
gdb
to get the information you need to construct your exploit string. Set a breakpoint withingetbuf()
and run to this breakpoint. Determine parameters such as the address ofval
and the location of the buffer.
Level 2: Firecracker
A much more sophisticated form of buffer attack involves supplying
a string that encodes actual machine instructions. The exploit string
then overwrites the return pointer with the starting address of these
instructions. When the calling function (in this
case getbuf
) executes its ret
instruction,
the program will start executing the instructions on the stack rather
than returning. With this form of attack, you can get the program to
do almost anything. The code you place on the stack is called
the exploit code. This style of attack is tricky, though,
because you must get machine code onto the stack and set the return
pointer to the start of this code.
For Level 2, you will need to run your exploit
within gdb
for it to succeed. (Modern systems use memory protection mechanisms to prevent execution of memory locations in the stack and guard against exactly this type of attack. Since gdb
works a little differently than normal program execution, it allows the exploit to succeed.)
Within the file umbrella
there is a function bang()
:
unsigned global_value = 0;
void bang(unsigned val) {
entry_check(2); /* Make sure entered this function properly */
if (global_value == cookie) {
printf("Bang!: You set global_value to 0x%x\n", global_value);
validate(2);
} else {
printf("Misfire: global_value = 0x%x\n", global_value);
}
exit(0);
}
Similar to Levels 0 and 1, your task is to get umbrella
to execute the code for bang()
rather than returning
to test()
. Before this, however, you must set global
variable global_value
to your cookie. Your exploit code
should set global_value
, push the address
of bang()
on the stack, and then execute
a ret
instruction to cause a jump to the code
for bang()
.
Advice:
- Determining the byte encoding of instruction sequences by hand
is tedious and prone to errors. You can let tools do all of the work
by writing an assembly code file containing the instructions and
data you want to put on the stack. Assemble this file
with
gcc
and disassemble it withobjdump
. This will allow you to see the byte sequence to include in your exploit. (A brief example of how to do this is included in the Generating Byte Codes section above.) - Keep in mind that your exploit string depends on your machine,
your compiler, and even your cookie. Make sure your exploit
string works on the CS Linux machines, and make sure you include your Bitbucket
username on the command line to
umbrella
. -
Watch your use of address modes when writing assembly code. Note that
movl $0x4, %eax
moves the value0x00000004
into register%eax
; whereasmovl 0x4, %eax
moves the value at memory location0x00000004
into%eax
, which is not likely your intnent. (Also, because that memory location is usually undefined, the second instruction will cause a segmentation fault!) - Do not attempt to use either a
jmp
or acall
instruction to jump to the code forbang()
. These instructions use PC-relative addressing, which is very tricky to set up correctly in this attack. Instead, push an address on the stack and use theret
instruction.
Level 3: Whizbang
For level 3, you will need to run your umbrella
exploit
within gdb
for it to succeed.
Our preceding attacks have all caused the program to jump to the
code for some other function, which then causes the program to
exit. As a result, it was acceptable to use exploit strings that
corrupt the stack, overwriting the saved value of
register %ebp
and the return pointer.
The most sophisticated form of buffer overflow attack causes the
program to execute some exploit code that patches up the stack and
makes the program return to the original calling function
(test()
in this case). The calling function is oblivious
to the attack. This style of attack is tricky, though, since you must:
(1) get machine code onto the stack, (2) set the return pointer to the
start of this code, and (3) undo the corruptions made to the stack
state.
Your job for this level is to supply an exploit string that will
cause getbuf()
to return your cookie back
to test()
, rather than the value 1. You can see in the
code for test()
that this will cause the program to go
Boom!
. Your exploit code should set your cookie as the
return value, restore any corrupted state, push the correct return
location on the stack, and execute a ret
instruction to
really return to test()
.
Advice:
-
In order to overwrite the return pointer, you must also overwrite the saved value of
%ebp
. However, it is important that this value is correctly restored before you return totest()
. You can do this by either (1) making sure that your exploit string contains the correct value of the saved%ebp
in the correct position, so that it never gets corrupted, or (2) restore the correct value as part of your exploit code. You’ll see that the code fortest()
has some explicit tests to check for a corrupted stack. -
The NOP instruction is useful when constructing this style of buffer overflow exploit, used in a pattern called a “NOP sled”.
-
You can use
gdb
to get the information you need to construct your exploit string. Set a breakpoint withingetbuf()
and run to this breakpoint. Determine parameters such as the saved return address and the saved value of%ebp
. -
Again, let tools such as
gcc
andobjdump
do all of the work of generating a byte encoding of the instructions. -
Keep in mind that your exploit string depends on your machine, your compiler, and even your cookie. Again, again make sure your exploit string works on the CS Linux machines, and make sure you include your Bitbucket username on the command line to
umbrella
.
Reflect on what you have accomplished. You caused a program to execute machine code of your own design. You have done so in a sufficiently stealthy way that the program did not realize that anything was amiss.
Mayhem
execve
is system call that replaces the currently running
program with another program inheriting all the open file descriptors. What
are the limitations the exploits you have preformed so far? How could calling
execve
allow you to circumvent this limitation? If you have time,
try writing an additional exploit that uses execve
and another
program to print a message.
Submitting Your Work
Make sure the following files are committed (hg commit
) and pushed (hg push
) so they appear in your Bitbucket repository for this assignment:
smoke.txt
- Level 0 exploitfizz.txt
- Level 1 exploitbang.txt
- Level 2 exploitboom.txt
- Level 3 exploitid.txt
- contains your usernamejournal.txt
orjournal.pdf
- log of the reverse engineering discoveries and techniques that enabled your exploits
The first four files correspond to the different exploits. Each of
these files should contain only the hex-formatted exploit
string (i.e., input to sendstring
, not the actual byte output of sendstring
). The id.txt
file should contain your CS
username followed by an empty line. We will run your exploits. Additional text or different naming will cause them to fail.
Before submitting your exploits, you can check them by placing them
in the same directory as umbrella
and running make
test
. This will generate a summary of your exploits and whether they
succeed. The Makefile looks for the four exploit files above and sends the contents of each to umbrella
. Update: you may have a stale version of the accompanying Makefile.